[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100326091639.GG27394@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:39 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Make lockstats counting per cpu
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, chain_lookup_hits);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, chain_lookup_misses);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, hardirqs_on_events);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, hardirqs_off_events);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, redundant_hardirqs_on);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, redundant_hardirqs_off);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, softirqs_on_events);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, softirqs_off_events);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, redundant_softirqs_on);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, redundant_softirqs_off);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, nr_unused_locks);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, nr_cyclic_checks);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, nr_find_usage_backwards_checks);
btw., i think this should really be cleaned up and put into a helper struct.
'struct lockdep_stats' or so?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists