[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269595692.12097.128.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:28:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Run interrupt handlers always with interrupts
disabled
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:06:44AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The following patch series removes the IRQF_DISABLED functionality
> > > from the core interrupt code and runs all interrupt handlers with
> > > interrupts disabled.
> >
> > As was covered in previous discussions, what about drivers such as SMC91x
> > which take a long time to retrieve packets from the hardware? Always running
> > handlers with IRQs disabled will kill things such as serial on these
> > platforms.
>
> As long as it's rare (which it is) i dont see a problem: you can enable
> interrupts in the handler by using local_irq_enable(), like the IDE PIO
> drivers do. That way it's documented a bit better as well, because it shows
> the precise source of the latency, with a big comment explaining it, etc.
Or alternatively, use threaded interrupts for such slow hardware.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists