linux-kernel - set_cpus_allowed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1269597796.12097.133.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:03:16 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: set_cpus_allowed_ptr

Hi,

Would it make sense to clean up the set_cpus_allowed() vs
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() mess using the semantic patch tool?

I guess it would be three patches:
 1) converting the current remaining set_cpus_allowed() users into
    set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
 2) remove set_cpus_allowed().
 3) rename set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to set_cpus_allowed()



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/