[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100326101241.GZ20695@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:12:41 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Run interrupt handlers always with interrupts disabled
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:08:53AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:59 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > As long as it's rare (which it is) i dont see a problem: you can enable
> > > interrupts in the handler by using local_irq_enable(), like the IDE PIO
> > > drivers do. That way it's documented a bit better as well, because it shows
> > > the precise source of the latency, with a big comment explaining it, etc.
> >
> > I don't think it's as rare as you think particularly in embedded, and the
> > moment you start explicitly using local_irq_enable() you've simply moved
> > the underlying problem back and made it far harder to grep for.
>
> We've got local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() which should be used and can
> easily be grep'ed for.
>
> But yes, I would much prefer to simply convert these known slow handlers
> to threaded interrupts.
That could be potentially hundreds in old obscure drivers all over the tree.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists