[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4BACAD00020000780003726B@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:48:00 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: <yinghai@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: free_bootmem() == free_early() with CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
Why is free_bootmem() not calling free_early_partial() instead? I don't
think the (legacy?) bootmem allocator had a restriction on not allowing
partial blocks to be returned, and it certainly didn't fail on fragments of
blocks previously reserved with reserve_early() being freed.
Seems like a regression to me, but I'd like to understand first if there
is any deeper reason behind the chosen solution.
Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists