linux-kernel - Re: behavior of recvmmsg() on blocking sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a36005b51003260500v6d8b7a5av1bbba848cc8998a4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:00:11 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To:	Brandon Black <blblack@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: behavior of recvmmsg() on blocking sockets

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 16:35, Brandon Black <blblack@...il.com> wrote:
> +                /* MSG_WAITFORONE turns on MSG_DONTWAIT after one packet */
> +               if (!datagrams++ && flags & MSG_WAITFORONE)
> +                       flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;

There should be an extra pair of parenthesis around the & operands but
aside from that I could imagine this to work.

Would be nice if the netdev folks would respond.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/