[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100326125459.GD3345@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:54:59 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Grzegorz Nosek <root@...aldomain.pl>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing lxc 0.6.5 in Fedora 13
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:45:22PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:53:57AM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > Yup. strace would need to be modified to use that. I tried that and it still
> > won't work -- I seem to recall it didn't work because strace uses pid values
> > obtained from the wait syscall too. To make it work we'd need to be able to
> > translate those pids in userspace. That's do-able from userspace if you trace
> > all forks descending from the pidns init task. But it's not do-able for
> > simple attaches. That's why I was thinking Eric's setns() might be able to
> > help if strace used it to enter the tracee's pid namespace whenever we need to.
> >
> > gdb often doesn't use the same methods but has similar problems with pid
> > namespaces.
>
> Hmm, is there a good reason why strace does not use the data explicitly
> provided by the kernel but instead second-guesses it from syscall return
> values? I don't know anything about ptrace, really, but I'd expect the
strace isn't linux-only. Checking the syscall return values may be seen
as being more portable. At least that's my guess. That said there are
plenty of #ifdefs in strace and patching it to use GETEVENTMSG is quite
a small patch.
However, as I said, that still doesn't "fix" strace so that it can
be used to trace tasks in child pid namespaces. Especially when the
traced tasks are more than one namepace deeper. :(
> kernel to provide the tracer with out-of-band information otherwise
> taken from clone/waitpid/other syscalls?
I don't think the kernel provides special out-of-band methods for fetching
pids related to traced tasks except during fork and clone. Not wait*(). The
rest of ptrace tends to be focused on reading/writing registers/memory and
managing signal delivery.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists