[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BACE918.7020508@workingcode.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:04:24 -0400
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@...kingcode.com>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@...il.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] fix packet loss and massive ping spikes with PPP multi-link
Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Also, I am not sure if it would not be better to default to no
> fragmentation and enable it optionally. I am aware that changing default
> behaviour is always a bit of a problem but to the best of my knowledge
> enabling fragmentation is a bug in any and all real-world applications.
It worked well and was enabled by default on all the Bay Networks
equipment I used ~15 years ago. And I know for certain that we tested
with other gear (Ascend and Clam, probably) that did it right.
If it works with the equipment you're using, it's a useful feature in
that it can balance out the latencies among the links, resulting in much
lower overall latency observed by higher layers -- especially so on
lower-speed links where MP is more likely to be used. Without it,
you're left either waiting for the one slow link choking on a big packet
to catch up, or (worse) disabling the sequence headers altogether,
resulting in reordering unless you're really "clever."
It's a darned shame that lame implementations would force a change in
the default ...
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@...kingcode.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists