[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269572846.8653.39.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:07:26 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sis-agp: Remove SIS 760, handled by amd64-agp
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:48 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > SIS 760 is listed in the device tables for both amd64-agp and sis-agp.
> > amd64-agp is apparently preferable since it has workarounds for some
> > BIOS misconfigurations that sis-agp doesn't handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/agp/sis-agp.c | 8 --------
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Looks fine to me. Hopefully, amd64-agp can handle all SIS 760 systems.
>
> Can we confirm that this can fix bugs reported in Debian's bug
> tracking system (which you mentioned earlier)?
[...]
The bug involves amd64-agp screwing with a device that is already bound
to sis-agp. This patch should be sufficient to work around that. But
the second patch, to amd64-agp, should actually fix it. This is not
confirmed but I can try to get the bug submitters to test it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists