linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.34-rc2 breaks via82cxxx Host Protected Area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100327.074434.193717071.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bzolnier@...il.com
Cc:	david@...es.net, jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc2 breaks via82cxxx Host Protected Area

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:19:53 +0100

> The commit itself may also have a problem but since it was _never_ in
> linux-next tree it never saw a wider upstream testing.

This is not true Bart.

My ide-2.6 and ide-next-2.6 trees are both included in
linux-next   And if they are not, that needs to be fixed
because they very much are intended to be.

In any event, you wrote a patch which broke something and
if you're not willing to work on a fix I have no choice
but to simply revert.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/