[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100327231202.GC5096@nowhere>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:12:05 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] perf: add pipe-specific header read/write and
event processing code
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:05:05PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:57:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:14:57AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:05:24AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +int perf_header__write_pipe(struct perf_header *self, int fd)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct perf_file_header_pipe f_header;
> > > > + int err;
> > > > +
> > > > + f_header = (struct perf_file_header_pipe){
> > > > + .magic = PERF_MAGIC,
> > > > + .size = sizeof(f_header),
> > > > + };
> >
> > > I actually wonder why you bother with a header in the pipe mode,
> > > since it only contains MAGIC and its size.
> >
> > Because he wants to detect endianness :-)
>
> Elaborating: piping over netcat from a big endian to a little endian
> machine works because he used the ->needs_swap logic I implemented to
> allow cross platform analysis.
>
> Its just a matter of having the DSOS with matching build-ids in the
> cache of the machine running 'perf report'.
>
> - Arnaldo
Ok, thanks for the explanations :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists