lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:17:32 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] x86: Make sure free_init_pages() free pages in
 boundary

On 03/26/2010 05:07 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:45:56PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 03/26/2010 04:06 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:21:32PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
>>>> index adedeef..fe3d953 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
>>>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ void __init i386_start_kernel(void)
>>>>  		u64 ramdisk_image = boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image;
>>>>  		u64 ramdisk_size  = boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_size;
>>>>  		u64 ramdisk_end   = ramdisk_image + ramdisk_size;
>>>> +		ramdisk_end = PFN_UP(ramdisk_end) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>
>>> Why not PAGE_ALIGN()?
>>
>> looks like PFN_UP is more clear.
> 
> Why would you convert to a pfn just to go back to a physical address,
> when all you wanted is align at the next page boundary?  It looks
> rather clumsy.

reserve_early() will take phys addr

> 
> PAGE_ALIGN() is pretty wide spread and I think it's clear to most
> people what it does.

we may need to clean up all those:
round_up
round_down
roundup
ALIGN
PAGE_ALIGN etc.

> 
...
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>>> @@ -332,6 +332,16 @@ int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pagenr)
>>>>  void free_init_pages(char *what, unsigned long begin, unsigned long end)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	unsigned long addr = begin;
>>>> +	unsigned long addr_aligned, end_aligned;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Make sure boundaries are page aligned */
>>>> +	addr_aligned = PFN_UP(addr) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> +	end_aligned = PFN_DOWN(end) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (WARN(addr_aligned != addr || end_aligned != end, "free_init_pages: range [%#lx, %#lx] is not aligned\n", addr, end)) {
>>>> +		addr = addr_aligned;
>>>> +		end = end_aligned;
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> Maybe realign only for when it is not aligned?  So to keep the fixup
>>> out of line.
>>>
>>> I suppose WARN_ON() is enough as it will print a stack trace which
>>> should be enough clue of what went wrong.
>>
>> we need to PFN_DOWN the end, and don't free the partial page.
>> otherwise could crash the system.
> 
> Dito.
> 
> 	if (WARN_ON(not_aligned)) {
> 		align
> 	}
> 
> is what I meant.
> 
ok i got it.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ