[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003270244.17865.rob@landley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:44:16 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: blauwirbel@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28.
On Friday 26 March 2010 22:37:45 David Miller wrote:
> From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:35:47 -0500
>
> > What exactly was the problem with just saying "unsigned short" when you
> > mean an unsigned short? The way x86 does, and arm? (If these ever
> > change, it breaks binary compatability. Not sure what these changes were
> > trying to accomplish...)
>
> I was trying to use well defined types that described the
> usage and the origin of the definition.
>
> I'm happy to use "unsigned short" or whatever works better.
> Please send a patch.
Sure thing:
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/stat.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/stat.h
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ struct stat {
ino_t st_ino;
mode_t st_mode;
short st_nlink;
- uid16_t st_uid;
- gid16_t st_gid;
+ unsigned short st_uid;
+ unsigned short st_gid;
unsigned short st_rdev;
off_t st_size;
time_t st_atime;
Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists