[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100327002404.GB9280@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:24:04 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Chad Talbott <ctalbott@...gle.com>
Cc: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
mrubin@...gle.com, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dpshah@...gle.com,
Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] io-controller: Use names rather than major:minor
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:20:56PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[..]
> > Which controllers are these?
> >
>
> linux-2.6/Documentation/cgroups/devices.txt
>
> > > - Displaying both device major/minor and diskname is an option but that
> > > makes the file format syntax little complicated and new rule setting
> > > or removoal confusing.
> >
> > A few messages back you mentioned that you preferred device names
> > because they would be better for users of the system. If there was a
> > simple implementation, would you still be behind a new name-based
> > interface? We could go that direction and maintain ABI by deprecating
> > current interface and making a new interface with names.
> >
> > If you can't tell, I'm a big fan of using the name! :) It's *much*
> > more consistent with the interfaces in /sys.
>
> /sys provides facility to access device both through device number
> (/sys/dev/block/<major:minor>) and disk name (/sys/block/<diskname>). So
> I don't know why do you think it is more consistent with /sys if we
> use diskname.
>
> In general user space seems to be accessing devices using device files.
> For example, blockdev utility.
One more example is "blktrace".
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists