linux-kernel - Re: [GIT, RFC] Killing the Big Kernel Lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100328231847.GH5116@nowhere>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:18:48 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jblunck@...e.de,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT, RFC] Killing the Big Kernel Lock

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann (44):
>       [...]
>       procfs: kill BKL in llseek


About this one, there is a "sensible" part:


@@ -1943,7 +1949,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fdinfo_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations proc_fdinfo_file_operations = {
-	.open		= nonseekable_open,
+	.llseek		= generic_file_llseek,
 	.read		= proc_fdinfo_read,
 };
 

Replacing default_llseek() by generic_file_llseek() as you
did for most of the other parts is fine.

But the above changes the semantics as it makes it seekable.
Why not just keeping it as is? It just ends up in no_llseek().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/