[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100328034859.GP2343@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:48:59 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: make dead code really dead
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:15:20AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> cleanup: make dead code really dead
Good catch! I have queued this one up for RCU for 2.6.35.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index e6014e1..1947c4e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1236,11 +1236,11 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
> break; /* grace period idle or initializing, ignore. */
>
> case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
> -
> - raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
> if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
> break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
>
> + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
> +
> /* Record dyntick-idle state. */
> force_qs_rnp(rsp, dyntick_save_progress_counter);
> raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists