[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100329131633.GA22730@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:16:34 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dipankar@...ibm.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] extable and module add object is static
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@...radead.org) wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:39 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > +static int core_object_is_static(void *obj)
> > > +{
> > [...]
> > > + if (addr >= (unsigned long)__per_cpu_start &&
> > > + addr <= (unsigned long)__per_cpu_end)
> > > + return 1;
> >
> > This may only correct for UP.
> > You may need arch-special codes for SMP.
> >
>
> Tejun has patches for this.
>
That's great! Tejun, can you point me out to an update version of these
patches ? I am particularly interested in being able to know the range of
statically defined per-cpu data.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists