linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvram: Convert nvram_ioctl to unlocked_ioctl, remove smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383519680.42441269869622199.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:33:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvram: Convert nvram_ioctl to unlocked_ioctl, remove
 smp_lock.h


----- "John Kacur" <jkacur@...hat.com> wrote:

> After removing the BKL from open, we can also convert nvram_ioctl to
> an unlocked_ioctl. It has it's only spin_lock, and doesn't rely on the
> BKL
> 
> This file no longer uses the BKL so smp_lock.h can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/nvram.c |   18 ++++++++----------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c
> index 5eb83c3..0c3ba6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  
> @@ -297,8 +296,7 @@ checksum_err:
>  	return -EIO;
>  }
>  
> -static int nvram_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> -					unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +static long nvram_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
> long arg)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> @@ -419,13 +417,13 @@ static int nvram_add_proc_fs(void)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
>  
>  static const struct file_operations nvram_fops = {
> -	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> -	.llseek		= nvram_llseek,
> -	.read		= nvram_read,
> -	.write		= nvram_write,
> -	.ioctl		= nvram_ioctl,
> -	.open		= nvram_open,
> -	.release	= nvram_release,
> +	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
> +	.llseek			= nvram_llseek,
> +	.read			= nvram_read,
> +	.write			= nvram_write,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl		= nvram_ioctl,
> +	.open			= nvram_open,
> +	.release		= nvram_release,
>  };
>  
>  static struct miscdevice nvram_dev = {
> -- 
> 1.6.0.6

Sorry for the double send, I must have messed-up something with
git-send-email. The --compose failed on me, and that part of the message was
lost afaict.

What I wanted to say was, Ingo, in the past you carried nvram fixes, so
if no-one objects to this change, can you integrate this one?

This did have a curiosity in the history. It seems that Linus's tree had the
remove smp_lock.h patch before the patch to remove BKL hit his tree. So
I combined that little bit with my previous patch that turns this into
an unlocked ioctl. (resend of http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.2/01608.html)

Thanks

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/