lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2cc26e41003290740i5c548cabgc95d91958cd1075a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:40:36 +0200
From:	Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
Cc:	Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:50, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com> wrote:
>> It didn't 'work' for me.
>
> You still don't get it?  No shell provides you with a correct error
> message.  There is quite some work involved (reading program header,
> finding the interpreter entry, checking the file) to give a meaningful
> error message.  Changing the error code alone achieves nothing.

File not found is a very common error message with a pretty will
understood meaning. Overloading it in this way causes confusion.
Overloading another error code would avoid this confusion, especially
since it's far less used.

Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ