[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100329155700.GA3066@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:57:00 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/12] arch/s390/kernel: Add missing unlock
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:33:52PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> In the default case the lock is not unlocked. The return is
> converted to a goto, to share the unlock at the end of the function.
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> index 14ef6f0..247b4c2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -165,10 +165,11 @@ static void tl_to_cores(struct tl_info *info)
> default:
> clear_cores();
> machine_has_topology = 0;
> - return;
> + goto out;
> }
> tle = next_tle(tle);
> }
> +out:
> spin_unlock_irq(&topology_lock);
Applied. Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists