linux-kernel - Re: behavior of recvmmsg() on blocking sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BB0D2CF.9040903@nortel.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:18:23 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Brandon Black <blblack@...il.com>
CC:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: behavior of recvmmsg() on blocking sockets

On 03/27/2010 07:19 AM, Brandon Black wrote:

> I've been playing with the timeout argument to recvmmsg as well now,
> and I'm struggling to see how one would ever use it correctly with the
> current implementation.

I'd probably do something like this:

prev = current time
loop forever
	cur = current time
	timeout = max_latency - (cur - prev)
	recvmmsg(timeout)
	process all received messages
	prev = cur

Basically you determine the max latency you're willing to wait for a
packet to be handled, then subtract the amount of time you spent
processing messages from that and pass it into the recvmmsg() call as
the timeout.  That way no messages will be delayed for longer than the
max latency. (Not considering scheduling delays.)

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/