linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100329164738.GA3527@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:47:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Ingo, what's the state of the "fix CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y" patches? I've seen 
> the patches several times, but I've been expecting to pull them from the 
> -tip tree rather than apply them directly.

Thanks, i missed their .34 relevance and was concentrating too much on the 
whole series ...

> It's mainly the "avoid infinite loop" thing, but Yinghai seems to think the 
> three first patches of his (currently 31-patch) series are all 2.6.34 
> material.
> 
> Ping?

I'm on them now - just applied the three patches & tidied up the changelogs - 
will send them later today or tomorrow at the latest after some testing (if 
you dont beat me to it).

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/