[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1003291253410.3358-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:58:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: Xorg+khubd lockup (D-state) BUG / ioctl EVIOCGNAME
failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device / PreInit returned NULL
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> bus pci, device 0000:00:0b.0
> OHCI Host Controller
> ohci_hcd
> OHCI 1.0, NO legacy support registers
> control 0x68f RWE RWC HCFS=operational IE PLE CBSR=3
> cmdstatus 0x00000 SOC=0
> intrstatus 0x00000020 FNO
> intrenable 0x8000004e MIE RHSC RD SF WDH
> ed_controlhead 7bef1b90
> hcca frame 0x4657
> fmintvl 0xa7782edf FIT FSMPS=0xa778 FI=0x2edf
> fmremaining 0x80002b76 FRT FR=0x2b76
> periodicstart 0x2a2f
> lsthresh 0x0628
> hub poll timer off
> roothub.a 01000208 POTPGT=1 NPS NDP=8(8)
> roothub.b 00000000 PPCM=0000 DR=0000
> roothub.status 00008000 DRWE
> roothub.portstatus [0] 0x00000100 PPS
> roothub.portstatus [1] 0x00000100 PPS
> roothub.portstatus [2] 0x00000100 PPS
> roothub.portstatus [3] 0x00000100 PPS
> roothub.portstatus [4] 0x00000303 LSDA PPS PES CCS
> roothub.portstatus [5] 0x00000303 LSDA PPS PES CCS
> roothub.portstatus [6] 0x00000100 PPS
> roothub.portstatus [7] 0x00000100 PPS
I don't notice anything suspicious there.
> > At the same time, just to be increase my level of certainty, you should
> > apply the following debugging patch for ohci-hcd. Let's see both the
> > usbmon trace and the dmesg log for the same event. The trace and the
> > debugging patch will generate plenty of output during normal operation,
> > but don't worry about that. Only the part starting from shortly before
> > the mouse quits really matters.
> Yes, I've done this before for a bug in the Intel USB controller (P55) on
> another motherboard.. Should be doable, always funny though how it does not
> happen when you are trying to make it happen.
>
> For your patch, what does this patch against? It does not apply cleanly
> for 2.6.33.
Yes it does. Maybe there's something wrong with the way your email
client extracted the patch from the message.
> It also fails against 2.6.34-rc2, can you diff -u and show the patch so
> I can patch manually or include a patch against 2.6.33 or 2.6.34-rc2?
That _was_ a "diff -u"-style patch.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists