lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100329174723.GB5101@nowhere>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:47:25 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Use hot regs with software sched
	switch/migrate events

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:49:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 07:11 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Scheduler's task migration events don't work because they always
> > pass NULL regs perf_sw_event(). The event hence gets filtered
> > in perf_swevent_add().
> > 
> > Scheduler's context switches events use task_pt_regs() to get
> > the context when the event occured which is a wrong thing to
> > do as this won't give us the place in the kernel where we went
> > to sleep but the place where we left userspace. The result is
> > even more wrong if we switch from a kernel thread.
> > 
> > Use the hot regs snapshot for both events as they belong to the
> > non-interrupt/exception based events family. Unlike page faults
> > or so that provide the regs matching the exact origin of the event,
> > we need to save the current context.
> > 
> > This makes the task migration event working and fix the context
> > switch callchains and origin ip.
> 
> 
> But after this its no longer possible to profile userspace on context
> switches is it?


Once the callchain on the kernel finishes, we bounce to the userspace
part, using task_pt_regs(). The previous version was incorrect because
it was ignoring the kernel part.

But you makes me wonder... We don't take into account exclude_kernel
or exclude_user with these hot regs.

I think we need several new things:

Every arch does its own:

	if (!is_user)
		perf_callchain_kernel(regs, entry);

	if (current->mm)
		perf_callchain_user(regs, entry);

Plus perf_callchain_user() goes fetching task_pt_regs()
by itself.

This is a check we should do from the core, according
to exclude_kernel, exclude_user, user_mode and current->mm

Archs shouldn't bother about these details.
They should just implement perf_callchain_kernel and perf_callchain_user
rather than a monolithic one that deals with contexts.

Each time we pass regs to perf_event_overflow() we should call
a perf_filter_callchain(struct pt_regs *default) that checks the
exclude_* things and override with task_pt_regs() if needed
(and if current->mm is set) so that even the ip source will
be correct.

And a generic perf_callchain() can deal with perf_callchain_kernel()
and perf_callchain_user() calls, again, according the exclude_*
policies.

I'm going to make a quick fix for perf_fetch_caller_regs() that
passes task_pt_regs if exclude_kernel for perf/urgent,
and I'll do the above cleanups/invasive fixes on perf/core.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ