linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/12] kernel/trace: Add missing unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1269886844.19685.4705.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:20:44 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] kernel/trace: Add missing unlock

On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:37 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> 
> In some error handling cases the lock is not unlocked.  The return is
> converted to a goto, to share the unlock at the end of the function.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> expression E1;
> identifier f;
> @@
> 
> f (...) { <+...
> * spin_lock_irq (E1,...);
> ... when != E1
> * return ...;
> ...+> }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>

Applied, thanks!

-- Steve

> ---
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c          |    8 +++++---
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 05a9f83..cd2e1d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -1201,18 +1201,19 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned nr_pages)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>  		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(cpu_buffer->pages)))
> -			return;
> +			goto out;
>  		p = cpu_buffer->pages->next;
>  		bpage = list_entry(p, struct buffer_page, list);
>  		list_del_init(&bpage->list);
>  		free_buffer_page(bpage);
>  	}
>  	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(cpu_buffer->pages)))
> -		return;
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
>  	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
>  
> +out:
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1229,7 +1230,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>  		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(pages)))
> -			return;
> +			goto out;
>  		p = pages->next;
>  		bpage = list_entry(p, struct buffer_page, list);
>  		list_del_init(&bpage->list);
> @@ -1238,6 +1239,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
>  	rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
>  	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
>  
> +out:
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
>  }
>  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/