[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100329191209.GA4777@salidar.me.mortis.eu>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:12:09 +0200
From: Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: watchdog simple example: don't fail on fsync()
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
>> Don't terminate the watchdog daemon when fsync() fails because no
>> watchdog driver actually implements the fsync() syscall.
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler then to just do an fsync without checking the error-result?
Yes, it definitly would be. Though I think it would be even simpler to
simply ditch the fsync() call. Considering that none of the watchdog
drivers implements it, nor can I think of a usecase where it would make
sense to implement (as more than a NOP).
So instead I suggest the patch following this line:
========================================================================
doc: watchdog simple example: don't fail on fsync()
Don't terminate the watchdog daemon when fsync() fails because no
watchdog driver actually implements the fsync() syscall.
Signed-off-by: Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>
---
Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c b/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c
index 4cf72f3..ba45803 100644
--- a/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c
+++ b/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ int main(void)
ret = -1;
break;
}
- ret = fsync(fd);
- if (ret)
- break;
sleep(10);
}
close(fd);
--
1.6.4.4
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,
Giel van Schijndel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists