[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003291259400.14859@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: anfei <anfei.zhou@...il.com>
cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, anfei wrote:
> I think this method is okay, but it's easy to trigger another bug of
> oom. See select_bad_process():
> if (!p->mm)
> continue;
> !p->mm is not always an unaccepted condition. e.g. "p" is killed and
> doing exit, setting tsk->mm to NULL is before releasing the memory.
> And in multi threading environment, this happens much more.
> In __out_of_memory(), it panics if select_bad_process returns NULL.
> The simple way to fix it is as mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() does.
>
This is fixed by
oom-avoid-race-for-oom-killed-tasks-detaching-mm-prior-to-exit.patch in
the -mm tree.
See
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/oom-avoid-race-for-oom-killed-tasks-detaching-mm-prior-to-exit.patch
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index afeab2a..9aae208 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -588,12 +588,8 @@ retry:
> if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
> return;
>
> - /* Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic. */
> - if (!p) {
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> - dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL);
> - panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
> - }
> + if (!p)
> + p = current;
>
> if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, order, points, NULL,
> "Out of memory"))
The reason p wasn't selected is because it fails to meet the criteria for
candidacy in select_bad_process(), not necessarily because of a race with
the !p->mm check that the -mm patch cited above fixes. It's quite
possible that current has an oom_adj value of OOM_DISABLE, for example,
where this would be wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists