[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100329211525.GA17703@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:15:25 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, abogani@...ware.it
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: protect fork-time cgroup access
Add an rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() pair to protect a fork-time
cgroup access. This seems likely to be a false positive.
Located by: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
sched.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 9ab3cd7..d4bb5e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2621,7 +2621,9 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
+ rcu_read_lock();
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists