[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269899097.7101.29.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:57 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org, michael@...erman.id.au, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/31] lmb: Add __NOT_KEEP_LMB to put lmb code to .init
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:11 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:39:52 -0700
>
> > On 03/29/2010 11:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:20:28 -0700
> >>
> >>> BTW, it seems only PowerPC need to keep lmb after init stage, right ?
> >>
> >> For now. Sparc64 will need it at some point in the future.
> >
> > for memory hotplug support?
>
> Yes.
We also can use it to implement page_is_ram() which might help
get /dev/mem cachability setting right by default one day :-)
However, we only need to keep the memory list, not the reserve list.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists