[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100330192219.328C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:25:29 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
> Yes. It made subtle change.
> But we should not depend that change.
> Current logic seems to be good and clear than old.
> I think you were lucky at that time by not-good and not-clear logic.
>
> BTW, How about this?
Unfortunatelly, memcg need your removed code. if removed, swapping out
might happen although sc->may_swap==0 when priority==0.
Please give me little investigate time.
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..f0df563 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1646,11 +1646,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> int file = is_file_lru(l);
> unsigned long scan;
>
> - if (percent[file] == 0) {
> - nr[l] = 0;
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l);
> if (priority) {
> scan >>= priority;
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a hrefmailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists