linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] alpha: hack objstrip.c to make it compile.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BB20AAB.7000909@twiddle.net>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:28:59 -0700
From:	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
To:	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
CC:	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, ang@...gante.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] alpha: hack objstrip.c to make it compile.

On 03/29/2010 06:49 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> I don't think this is the appropriate fix. What should I do to fix this?
> ---
>  arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c b/arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c
> index 367d53d..54fa1ef 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c
> +++ b/arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
>  #include <linux/param.h>
>  #ifdef __ELF__
>  # include <linux/elf.h>
> +# define elfhdr	elf64_hdr
> +# define elf_phdr	elf64_phdr
> +# define elf_check_arch(x) ((x)->e_machine == EM_ALPHA)
>  #endif
>  

Hum.  Is it so bad to just #define __KERNEL__ here before
that one include?  Similar games are played in tools/perf/,
and with a suitible comment I think that should be all right.


r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/