linux-kernel - Re: [stable] nfsd changes for 2.6.34

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100330144054.GD11545@fieldses.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:40:54 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	stable@...nel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] nfsd changes for 2.6.34

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:24:14AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:52:12PM -0500, bfields wrote:
> > > Please pull the following nfsd changes from the 'nfsd' branch at:
> > > 
> > >   git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.34 nfsd
> > > 
> > > This is an unusually quiet cycle for the NFS server--bugfixes, some IPv6
> > > progress, and one new export operation to improve sync performance.
> > > 
> > > One exception to the 'mostly quiet' statement was a regression in the
> > > rpc code which hit a lot of people: enormous thanks to Neil for tracking
> > > that down.
> > 
> > However, I forgot to Cc stable on all of those.  Stable people, could
> > you also take the following three commits?:
> > 
> > 	f5822754ea006563e1bf0a1f43faaad49c0d8bb2 Revert "sunrpc: fix
> > 	peername failed on closed listener"
> > 	1b644b6e6f6160ae35ce4b52c2ca89ed3e356e18 Revert "sunrpc: move
> > 	the close processing after do recvfrom method"
> > 	301e99ce4a2f42a317129230fd42e6cd874c64b0 nfsd: ensure sockets
> > 	are closed on error
> > 
> > Let me know if you need more information.
> 
> I've queued all of these up for the .33 -stable tree.  If any of them
> need to go into .32 (maybe that last one?), please let me know.

Thanks; .32 needs all three of those.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/