[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8739zhu52t.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:50:18 +0200
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] squashfs: gather everything block device specific into block.c
---
I lost this free somehow. Does squashfs_put_super() need protection
from multiple invocation? If not, this kfree could be removed from
there, and the condition from both places.
fs/squashfs/backend.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/backend.c b/fs/squashfs/backend.c
index a6136ca..0ae37ab 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/backend.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/backend.c
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ int squashfs_find_backend(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,
void squashfs_kill_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
+ if (sb->s_fs_info) {
+ kfree(sb->s_fs_info);
+ sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
if (sb->s_bdev) {
kill_block_super(sb);
--
1.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists