linux-kernel - Re: patch sparc64-make-prom-entry-spinlock-nmi-safe.patch added to 2.6.32-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100330.130727.119993073.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	stefan.bader@...onical.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch sparc64-make-prom-entry-spinlock-nmi-safe.patch added to
 2.6.32-stable tree

From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:07:42 +0200

> This converted the raw_spinlock usage which is used in the upstream patch but
> not available in 2.6.32 to normal spinlock usage. Should it get annotated to
> document that?

I don't think so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/