linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] audit: Reactive rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100330222302.GK30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:23:02 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Juraj Hlista <juro.hlista@...il.com>
Cc:	sgrubb@...hat.com, mitr@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Reactive rules

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Juraj Hlista wrote:
> From: Juraj Hlista <juro.hlista@...il.com>
> 
> Add support for reactive rules. An audit rule can contain more than one reaction. The reactions are identified by numbers in the kernel and by strings in the user space.

Huh?  We already have a way to associate a unique key with a rule; what does
that patch offer that can't be happily handled by userland with what we
already have?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/