[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100330225038.GA5817@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:50:40 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC 9/9] tty: implement BTM as mutex instead of BKL
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:56:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> +config TTY_MUTEX
> + bool "Use a mutex instead of BKL for TTY locking"
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && SMP
You still need it on UP-PREEMPT.
The bkl disables preemption so you need to "reproduce"
this atomicity by locking your path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists