lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100330224826.465471117@linux.site>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:42:14 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [100/156] netfilter: xt_recent: fix regression in rules using a zero hit_count

2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>

commit ef1691504c83ba3eb636c0cfd3ed33f7a6d0b4ee upstream.

Commit 8ccb92ad (netfilter: xt_recent: fix false match) fixed supposedly
false matches in rules using a zero hit_count. As it turns out there is
nothing false about these matches and people are actually using entries
with a hit_count of zero to make rules dependant on addresses inserted
manually through /proc.

Since this slipped past the eyes of three reviewers, instead of
reverting the commit in question, this patch explicitly checks
for a hit_count of zero to make the intentions more clear.

Reported-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 net/netfilter/xt_recent.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ recent_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, con
 		for (i = 0; i < e->nstamps; i++) {
 			if (info->seconds && time_after(time, e->stamps[i]))
 				continue;
-			if (info->hit_count && ++hits >= info->hit_count) {
+			if (!info->hit_count || ++hits >= info->hit_count) {
 				ret = !ret;
 				break;
 			}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ