linux-kernel - Re: KVM bug, git bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100330093114.8E93.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:34:15 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: KVM bug, git bisected

> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:29 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > Peter, would it be safe to increase PREEMPT_BITS to eg. 10?
> 
> One reason this all sucks massive is that nesting that many spinlocks
> creates a terribly large !preempt section.
> 
> There is nothing that stops someone from creating 64k vmas (or more when
> someone raises that sysctl) and try this, that's just utter suckage.

offtopic: We are plan to increase default maximum vmas limit from 64k
at 1 or 2 years later on 64bit. It was necessary because gdb couldn't
parse >64k vmas (i.e. mainly it's for core dump). but it was solved already.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/