linux-kernel - [016/156] ring-buffer: Move disabled check into preempt disable section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100330224730.467319437@linux.site>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:40:50 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [016/156] ring-buffer: Move disabled check into preempt disable section

2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

commit 52fbe9cde7fdb5c6fac196d7ebd2d92d05ef3cd4 upstream.

The ring buffer resizing and resetting relies on a schedule RCU
action. The buffers are disabled, a synchronize_sched() is called
and then the resize or reset takes place.

But this only works if the disabling of the buffers are within the
preempt disabled section, otherwise a window exists that the buffers
can be written to while a reset or resize takes place.

Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
LKML-Reference: <4B949E43.2010906@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2232,12 +2232,12 @@ ring_buffer_lock_reserve(struct ring_buf
 	if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
-		return NULL;
-
 	/* If we are tracing schedule, we don't want to recurse */
 	resched = ftrace_preempt_disable();
 
+	if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
+		goto out_nocheck;
+
 	if (trace_recursive_lock())
 		goto out_nocheck;
 
@@ -2469,11 +2469,11 @@ int ring_buffer_write(struct ring_buffer
 	if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
-		return -EBUSY;
-
 	resched = ftrace_preempt_disable();
 
+	if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
+		goto out;
+
 	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/