[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100330225715.926181800@linux.site>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:56:34 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [116/116] GFS2: Skip check for mandatory locks when unlocking
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>
commit 720e7749279bde0d08684b1bb4e7a2eedeec6394 upstream.
gfs2_lock() will skip locks on file which have mode set to 02666. This is a problem in cases where the mode of the file is changed after a process has obtained a lock on the file. Such a lock will be skipped and will result in a BUG in locks_remove_flock().
gfs2_lock() should skip the check for mandatory locks when unlocking a file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/gfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/file.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int gfs2_lock(struct file *file,
if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_POSIX))
return -ENOLCK;
- if (__mandatory_lock(&ip->i_inode))
+ if (__mandatory_lock(&ip->i_inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
return -ENOLCK;
if (cmd == F_CANCELLK) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists