[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1269995724.22564.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:35:24 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: lockup in rb_get_reader_page
Hi Jiaying,
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 16:27 -0700, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> We recently saw some cpu lockups while running kernel tracing.
> The problem started to happen after we synced up our ring buffer
> code with the upstream lockless ring buffer change. It usually
> took many hours and heavy trace load to hit this problem. When
> the lockup happens, the problematic cpu seemed to be in an infinite
> loop of trying to grab the head_page in rb_get_reader_page().
>
> We would like to check with you on whether this is a known issue.
> If so, do we have a bug fix? If not, do you have any suggestions on
> where we should check?
I'm unaware of any problems with the ring buffer. I've been running the
lockless version for over a year now, and hammering it with very
intensive tracing.
Now, you see this on the reader side. There has been a few recent fixes
that could cause problems when we have multiple readers. Ftrace usage
does not usually encounter multiple readers so I have not had issues.
But Li Zefan had a stress test that did find and trigger the problems.
Are you using the latest ring buffer that is in Linus's tree? Are you
resetting the ring buffer while reading it?
I guess I need to know more exactly what you are doing to understand the
problem.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists