linux-kernel - [PATCH 20/33] x86, lmb: Add lmb_find_area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1270001838-15857-21-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:17:05 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 20/33] x86, lmb: Add lmb_find_area_size()

size is returned according free range.
Will be used to find free ranges for early_memtest and memory corruption check

Do not mess it up with mm/lmb.c yet.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/Makefile |    2 +
 arch/x86/mm/lmb.c    |   88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/lmb.c

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
index a4c7683..8ab0505 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
@@ -26,4 +26,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o numa_$(BITS).o
 obj-$(CONFIG_K8_NUMA)		+= k8topology_64.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)		+= srat_$(BITS).o
 
+obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_LMB)		+= lmb.o
+
 obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST)		+= memtest.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3229e9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/lmb.h>
+#include <linux/bootmem.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/range.h>
+
+/* Check for already reserved areas */
+static inline bool __init bad_addr_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
+{
+	int i;
+	u64 addr = *addrp, last;
+	u64 size = *sizep;
+	bool changed = false;
+again:
+	last = addr + size;
+	for (i = 0; i < lmb.reserved.cnt && lmb.reserved.region[i].size; i++) {
+		struct lmb_property *r = &lmb.reserved.region[i];
+		if (last > r->base && addr < r->base) {
+			size = r->base - addr;
+			changed = true;
+			goto again;
+		}
+		if (last > (r->base + r->size) && addr < (r->base + r->size)) {
+			addr = round_up(r->base + r->size, align);
+			size = last - addr;
+			changed = true;
+			goto again;
+		}
+		if (last <= (r->base + r->size) && addr >= r->base) {
+			(*sizep)++;
+			return false;
+		}
+	}
+	if (changed) {
+		*addrp = addr;
+		*sizep = size;
+	}
+	return changed;
+}
+
+static u64 __init __lmb_find_area_size(u64 ei_start, u64 ei_last, u64 start,
+			 u64 *sizep, u64 align)
+{
+	u64 addr, last;
+
+	addr = round_up(ei_start, align);
+	if (addr < start)
+		addr = round_up(start, align);
+	if (addr >= ei_last)
+		goto out;
+	*sizep = ei_last - addr;
+	while (bad_addr_size(&addr, sizep, align) && addr + *sizep <= ei_last)
+		;
+	last = addr + *sizep;
+	if (last > ei_last)
+		goto out;
+
+	return addr;
+
+out:
+	return -1ULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Find next free range after *start
+ */
+u64 __init lmb_find_area_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < lmb.memory.cnt; i++) {
+		u64 ei_start = lmb.memory.region[i].base;
+		u64 ei_last = ei_start + lmb.memory.region[i].size;
+		u64 addr;
+
+		addr = __lmb_find_area_size(ei_start, ei_last, start,
+					 sizep, align);
+
+		if (addr != -1ULL)
+			return addr;
+	}
+
+	return -1ULL;
+}
+
-- 
1.6.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/