[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1270001838-15857-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:16:45 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -v11 00/33] use lmb with x86
the new lmb could be used to early_res in x86.
Suggested by: David, Ben, and Thomas
First one should go into 2.6.34.
-v6: change sequence as requested by Thomas
-v7: seperate them to more patches
-v8: add boundary checking to make sure not free partial page.
-v9: use lmb_debug to control print out of reserve_lmb.
add e820 clean up, and e820 become __initdata
-v10:use lmb.rmo_size and ARCH_DISCARD_LMB according to Michael
change name to lmb_find_area/reserve_lmb_area/free_lmb_area,
according to Michael
update find_lmb_area to use __lmb_alloc_base according to ben
-v11:move find_lmb_area_size back to x86.
x86 has own find_lmb_area, and could be disabled by ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA
because _lmb_find_base has different behavoir from x86's old one.
one from high to high and one from low to high
need more test
tested for x86 32bit/64bit, numa/nonuma, nobootmem/bootmem.
still keep find_lmb_area, may replace those find_lmb_area will lmb_alloc, if
everything go fine
Please consider to put them into tip to have more test coverage.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists