linux-kernel - Re: pr_* versus dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:57:02 +0300
From:	Neshama Parhoti <pneshama@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pr_* versus dev_*

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 08:42 +0300, Neshama Parhoti wrote:
>> so i should use whatever print call that adds most information right ?
>
> I think so.
>
>> even if that means that some part of the driver uses pr_* and some
>> part of the driver use dev_* ?
>
> Yes.
>
>

thank you !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/