linux-kernel - Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100330233851.17370621.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:38:51 -0400
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, trenn@...e.de, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
	mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:35:47 +0200 Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> wrote:

> Do you want a relative diff ontop of this patch or
> should I redo the original one?

I don't mind really.  I'll turn it into a delta locally so I can see
what changed.

I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the
x86 tree, btw.  They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I
suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/