linux-kernel - [058/116] NFSv4: Dont ignore the NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED flag in nfs_revalidate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100330225636.015008727@linux.site>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:55:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [058/116] NFSv4: Dont ignore the NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED flag in nfs_revalidate_inode()

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>

commit b4d2314bb88b07e5a04e6c75b442a1dfcd60e340 upstream.

If the NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED flag is set, that means that we don't yet have
an up to date attribute cache. Even if we hold a delegation, we must
put a GETATTR on the wire.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/nfs/delegation.h |    6 ++++++
 fs/nfs/dir.c        |    2 +-
 fs/nfs/inode.c      |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/delegation.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/delegation.h
@@ -68,4 +68,10 @@ static inline int nfs_inode_return_deleg
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline int nfs_have_delegated_attributes(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return nfs_have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ) &&
+		!(NFS_I(inode)->cache_validity & NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED);
+}
+
 #endif
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ static int nfs_access_get_cached(struct
 	cache = nfs_access_search_rbtree(inode, cred);
 	if (cache == NULL)
 		goto out;
-	if (!nfs_have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ) &&
+	if (!nfs_have_delegated_attributes(inode) &&
 	    !time_in_range_open(jiffies, cache->jiffies, cache->jiffies + nfsi->attrtimeo))
 		goto out_stale;
 	res->jiffies = cache->jiffies;
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ int nfs_attribute_timeout(struct inode *
 {
 	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
 
-	if (nfs_have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ))
+	if (nfs_have_delegated_attributes(inode))
 		return 0;
 	return !time_in_range_open(jiffies, nfsi->read_cache_jiffies, nfsi->read_cache_jiffies + nfsi->attrtimeo);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/