[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB31A6A.1000503@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:48:26 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Anders Darander <anders.darander@...arespons.se>
CC: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Erik Waling <erik.waling@...ftel.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] MACB: Set PHY address in kernel parameters
Anders Darander wrote:
> * Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> [100331 11:18]:
>> We're using phy_mask in one of our projects, it's still using 2.6.29,
>> though. I think it's worth testing if it's still working.
>
> Well, that was obviously something I overlooked / misinterpreted when I
> tried to solve our problem!
>
> As I understand it, phy_mask is a bitfield for setting which PHYs should
> be enabled... Then this should have worked OK for us!
Yes, it's a bitmask of PHYs that should be probed.
>> static struct at91_eth_data __initdata p298_macb_data = {
>> .is_rmii = 0,
>> .phy_mask = ~(1 << 8),
>> };
>
>> at91_add_device_eth(&p298_macb_data);
>
> I've not tested it, but it should probably have worked.
Cheers, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (261 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists