| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:54:34 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily
on 2010-3-11 19:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Ok, I try to make a new patch by using seqlock.
>
> Well... I do think seqlocks would be a bit simpler because they don't
> require this checking and synchronizing of this patch.
>
> But you are right: on non-x86 architectures seqlocks would probably be
> more costly than your patch in the fastpaths. Unless you can avoid
> using the seqlock in fastpaths and just have callers handle the rare
> case of an empty nodemask.
>
> cpuset_node_allowed_*wall doesn't need anything because it is just
> interested in one bit in the mask.
>
> cpuset_mem_spread_node doesn't matter because it will loop around and
> try again if it doesn't find any nodes online.
>
> cpuset_mems_allowed seems totally broken anyway
>
> etc.
>
> This approach might take a little more work, but I think it might be the
> best way.
Hi, Nick Piggin
The following is the new patch made by your idea. Could you review it?
Thanks!
Miao
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 11 +++++++++--
mm/mempolicy.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
mm/mmzone.c | 15 +++++++++++----
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index d109467..fbb1f1c 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -952,8 +952,6 @@ static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from,
static void cpuset_change_task_nodemask(struct task_struct *tsk,
nodemask_t *newmems)
{
- nodes_or(tsk->mems_allowed, tsk->mems_allowed, *newmems);
- mpol_rebind_task(tsk, &tsk->mems_allowed);
mpol_rebind_task(tsk, newmems);
tsk->mems_allowed = *newmems;
}
@@ -2442,6 +2440,15 @@ int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void)
node = next_node(current->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor, current->mems_allowed);
if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
node = first_node(current->mems_allowed);
+
+ /*
+ * if node is still MAX_NUMNODES, that means the kernel allocator saw
+ * an empty nodemask. In that case, the kernel allocator allocate
+ * memory on the current node.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(node == MAX_NUMNODES))
+ node = numa_node_id();
+
current->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor = node;
return node;
}
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 8034abd..75e819e 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1449,8 +1449,16 @@ static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
* the first node in the mask instead.
*/
if (unlikely(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) &&
- unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes)))
+ unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes))) {
nd = first_node(policy->v.nodes);
+ /*
+ * When rebinding task->mempolicy, th kernel allocator
+ * may see an empty nodemask, and first_node() returns
+ * MAX_NUMNODES, In that case, we will use current node.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(nd == MAX_NUMNODES))
+ nd = numa_node_id();
+ }
break;
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE: /* should not happen */
break;
@@ -1522,17 +1530,21 @@ unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
static unsigned offset_il_node(struct mempolicy *pol,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long off)
{
- unsigned nnodes = nodes_weight(pol->v.nodes);
+ nodemask_t tmp_nodes;
+ unsigned nnodes;
unsigned target;
int c;
int nid = -1;
+ tmp_nodes = pol->v.nodes;
+ nnodes = nodes_weight(tmp_nodes);
if (!nnodes)
return numa_node_id();
+
target = (unsigned int)off % nnodes;
c = 0;
do {
- nid = next_node(nid, pol->v.nodes);
+ nid = next_node(nid, tmp_nodes);
c++;
} while (c <= target);
return nid;
@@ -1631,7 +1643,9 @@ bool init_nodemask_of_mempolicy(nodemask_t *mask)
case MPOL_BIND:
/* Fall through */
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
+ task_lock(current);
*mask = mempolicy->v.nodes;
+ task_unlock(current);
break;
default:
diff --git a/mm/mmzone.c b/mm/mmzone.c
index f5b7d17..43ac21b 100644
--- a/mm/mmzone.c
+++ b/mm/mmzone.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct zoneref *next_zones_zonelist(struct zoneref *z,
nodemask_t *nodes,
struct zone **zone)
{
+ nodemask_t tmp_nodes;
/*
* Find the next suitable zone to use for the allocation.
* Only filter based on nodemask if it's set
@@ -65,10 +66,16 @@ struct zoneref *next_zones_zonelist(struct zoneref *z,
if (likely(nodes == NULL))
while (zonelist_zone_idx(z) > highest_zoneidx)
z++;
- else
- while (zonelist_zone_idx(z) > highest_zoneidx ||
- (z->zone && !zref_in_nodemask(z, nodes)))
- z++;
+ else {
+ tmp_nodes = *nodes;
+ if (nodes_empty(tmp_nodes))
+ while (zonelist_zone_idx(z) > highest_zoneidx)
+ z++;
+ else
+ while (zonelist_zone_idx(z) > highest_zoneidx ||
+ (z->zone && !zref_in_nodemask(z, &tmp_nodes)))
+ z++;
+ }
*zone = zonelist_zone(z);
return z;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists