linux-kernel - Re: kmemleak_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <g2n72cf309c1003310310pa0fabc7fw1824d17316e0f0a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:40:24 +0530
From:	Sachin Pandhare <sachinpandhare@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Sachin <sachinpandhare@...il.com>
Subject: Re: kmemleak_scan_area

Sorry, corrected myself in the code snippet
struct kmemleak_scan_area {
instead of
struct kmemleak_scan_area_node {

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Sachin Pandhare
<sachinpandhare@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
> In kmemleak.c file "kmemleak_scan_area" is appearing as a structure as
> well as a function.
> e.g.:
> - struct kmemleak_scan_area {
> - void __ref kmemleak_scan_area(const void *ptr, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
>
> Do you think it is a good to have it like that?
>
> regards,
> Sachin
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/