[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB340E1.2060704@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:32:33 +0200
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [76/89] sparc: TIF_ABI_PENDING bit removal
Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> ------------------
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> @@ -227,12 +227,11 @@ register struct thread_info *current_thr
> /* flag bit 8 is available */
> #define TIF_SECCOMP 9 /* secure computing */
> #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 10 /* syscall auditing active */
> -/* flag bit 11 is available */
> /* NOTE: Thread flags >= 12 should be ones we have no interest
> * in using in assembly, else we can't use the mask as
> * an immediate value in instructions such as andcc.
> */
For some reason I accidentally dropped the comment about bit 11. Replacment
patch attached.
Stefan
View attachment "0002-sparc-TIF_ABI_PENDING-bit-removal.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (3353 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists