linux-kernel - Re: [76/89] sparc: TIF_ABI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:32:33 +0200
From:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [76/89] sparc: TIF_ABI_PENDING bit removal

Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> ------------------

> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> @@ -227,12 +227,11 @@ register struct thread_info *current_thr
>  /* flag bit 8 is available */
>  #define TIF_SECCOMP		9	/* secure computing */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	10	/* syscall auditing active */
> -/* flag bit 11 is available */
>  /* NOTE: Thread flags >= 12 should be ones we have no interest
>   *       in using in assembly, else we can't use the mask as
>   *       an immediate value in instructions such as andcc.
>   */

For some reason I accidentally dropped the comment about bit 11. Replacment
patch attached.

Stefan

View attachment "0002-sparc-TIF_ABI_PENDING-bit-removal.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (3353 bytes)